On 07/13/12 01:16, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 07:13:37PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: >> On 12 July 2012 18:32, Mark Brown<[email protected]> >> wrote: > >>> Well, simple conflicts aren't that big a deal... However, Thomas >>> mentioned that in order to test this he merged the SPI tree into your >>> tree so perhaps there is also a dependency on the SPI tree? If that was >>> just for good practice testing then I agree that the best thing is to >>> merge via your tree, otherwise we might need to think harder. > >> There were no dependency on Grant's spi/next branch. It was merged >> just to ensure that nothing is broken. > > OK, great - then the Samsung tree it is.
Thanks, will apply. Mark, if you want to add your ack or review on them, let me know. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
