Linus Walleij wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Mark Brown > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > They have very few users and they're both just doing a single register > > write so the advantage of having the macro is a bit limited. An inline > > function might make sense but it's as easy to just do the writes > directly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]> > > Much clearer. > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> > Yeah, I agree, looks good to me.
But I think, nobody takes this series...? So may I take then send this series via samsung tree? Because for samsung spi dt, the file has been touched in samsung tree so it helps to avoid bad conflicts. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
