On 2012-12-04 10:11, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > Andreas Larsson <andr...@gaisler.com> wrote on 2012/12/04 08:58:50: >> Any comments on this? A fair amount of rearranging and ifdefing would >> be needed to make the spi-fsl-spi driver workable outside an fsl and >> powerpc environment so I rather get some input before before trying >> to perfect a solution that could not be acceptable into mainline. > > I am far from kernel devlopment ATM but I do have one comment, how to > ensure this new combined driver doesn't break on existing powerpc > systems?
Of course it would be preferable if the future patch would be tested on the original system to be sure nothing breaks. Taking the "do everything inside the existing driver" approach could limit the risk of breaking anything by not moving things around. To get the driver to work outside an fsl environment ifdefs can be added in a way that the code would essentially be the same running on the original systems. Then, new branches that will never be taken on the original boards can handle the newly added mode. This might not produce the most elegant code in the end though. The easiest way to make sure that nothing is broken is of course if I submit a completely separate driver, the downside being the duplicate code/functionality. Cheers, Andreas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
