Hi Mark, > On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 08:23:21AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > SPI flashes are the most significant users of this IP block on the > > MX23/MX28, that's why I'm unhappy patches that might break them were > > pulled in without any Tested-by/Reviewed-by/Acked-by . > > If the patches aren't getting reviewed by peole working with the > hardware on the lists one of the things getting them into -next should > hopefully do is expose them to a wider audience and help get that > testing. We've got until the merge window and then all the -rcs to > identify and deal with any problems.
I don't quite understand this, is it OK to merge untested patches? I have them in my review queue, but I was simply busy so I didn't get to them for a while. Fabio is unfortunatelly also N/A now, so things are slow. Best regards, Marek Vasut ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ spi-devel-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spi-devel-general
