Lynn Winebarger writes: > On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Russell Nelson wrote: > > We're the ones who figured out > > that "Open Source" isn't protectable. > You're the ones who decided "Open Source" isn't protectable. Whether > or not it is is another matter.
I don't mean to threaten you (because after all, I don't think "Open Source" is a trademark), but if push came to shove, who would a judge say owns "Open Source"? The Open Source Initiative, which has been certifying licenses as Open Source, or Software in the Public Interest? Remember, your registration application expired without action on your part. Now you're talking about re-applying for a trademark which as far as everyone can tell belongs to someone else. This is not rational behavior. -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | Government schools are so 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | bad that any rank amateur Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | can outdo them. Homeschool!
