On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 05:54:40PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > I gave you the social contract and it's been the right one for the > > > project. The activism role belongs in SPI, and Debian's role is to be a > > > member software project of SPI. > > > > I'm sorry, I find that insulting. Nothing in the social contract defines > > Debian's role with respect to SPI. [...] > > It's in the constitution. I think there's no sense flaming Bruce > for naming the wrong debian foundation document.
The constitution does define the relationship between SPI and Debian (though certainly not as Bruce described), but the distinction is relevant here - Bruce was heavily involved in the writing of the social contract, but the consitution was mostly written by Ian Jackson after Bruce had resigned. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.spi-inc.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/spi-general
