So, where is this thing that makes BSD "more free" according to BSD
fans? It's not in the license at all. It is in the policy that some
projects have that says they will not accept non-BSD-licensed
contributions, and that they will make source code available, and that
they will not bind anyone else to do these things.
We are getting way off point here. As I said, I did not bring up BSD /
GPL for a licensing discussion. It was simply a illustration to show
fundamental differences in thinking about FOSS.
Differences which you are clearly pronouncing for me, thank you :)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
Thanks
Bruce
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
_______________________________________________
Spi-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.spi-inc.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/spi-general
