On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 11:58:27AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > However, it's interesting that I think both first-past-the-post and > alternative vote (also known as instant run-off voting, reportedly > recommended by Robert's Rules for election-by-mail) would have > resulted in this same board: >
I've done a few others (Borda, Borda Elimination, Minmax, Nanson, Ranked Pairs, Condorcet (SPI), Condorcet (Debian), Bucklin, IRV, Pluralty) at http://blog.halon.org.uk/geek/spi/2007-election-results-calcs.html for those interested > > 95 votes were received. > > Finally, as I understand it, turn-out was 25% of voting members (not > the 25% of SPI members that some press reported). Why was turn-out so > low (at least, I think it's low for a vote-by-mail in this type of > organisation) and what steps will SPI be taking to increase it? > A review of who is a contributing member will be underway shortly. Neil -- Neil McGovern Secretary, Software in the Public Interest, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
