The meeting was last night (to me) and the usual day has changed to Wednesdays from now on. I've posted a log at http://people.debian.org/~mjr/irc/spi/spi-2007-09.html until the board start posting them to the SPI site again (logs are on the unlinked page http://www.spi-inc.org/corporate/meeting-minutes/logs but the most recent just now is 2007-05).
Highlights: # <Ganneff> [item 3, President's Report] - no Bdale, no report. # <Ganneff> [item 4, Treasurer's Report] # <schultmc> jberkus and I have hired an intern to help us get caught up on data entry # <schultmc> no formal report at this time - should be coming soon though # <jberkus> credit cards are up to date, working on checks # <Ganneff> [item 6, Outstanding minutes] # <Maulkin> Once again, I'm afraid I don't have any sets to present. I'll try and get these done shortly. # <Ganneff> 2007-09-19.jdd.1 - Review and determination of transaction providers # <luk> I would rather go for 'at least every 12 months if at all possible' # <linuxpoet> I do not find that required, as the board can always call a vote to defer # <cdlu> linuxpoet, if you consider it a friendly amendment then we can put it right to a vote and dispose of it. does it hurt your resolution's purpose? # <linuxpoet> cdlu: My concern is simple, the amendment opens the door for, "I couldn't get to it..." # <luk> and if it is not done, there should be very good reasons otherwise it would have been possible... # <linuxpoet> I believe the resolution is satisfactory. If it doesn't pass. It doesn't pass but I believe I have taken into account all reasonable language and have provided several drafts of modifications. Based on those considerations, plus the fact that I am more than willing to participate in the work itself, I believe we should go to vote. # <Maulkin> Current voting results for "Amend 2007-09-19.jdd.1 to include 'at least every 12 months if at all possible'": Yes: 6, No: 2, Abstain: 0, Missing: 0 () # <Maulkin> Current voting results for "Approve 2007-09-19.jdd.5.lc.1 (as amended) - Review and determination of transaction providers": Yes: 7, No: 0, Abstain: 1, Missing: 0 () # <Ganneff> [item 8, Next board meeting] # <Ganneff> Wednesday 17th Oct, 2007 - 20:00 UTC Any comments on the meeting? -- MJ Ray http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html tel:+844-4437-237 - Webmaster-developer, statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder, consumer and workers co-operative member http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ - Writing on koha, debian, sat TV, Kewstoke http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
