Jimmy Kaplowitz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 02:33:35PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > > 1) What was the resolution of potential legal liabilities for OpenWRT? > > Not that this means we should reject them, just that we should be informed. > > I think you're confusing this with the Helios [...] I'm not aware of > any such issues for OpenWRT, and a cursory look over the past emails relating > to them didn't reveal any. [...]
"I will try to coordinate with OpenWRT in a real-time conversation to find out more of what they want, and will ask our lawyers any questions necessary to resolve the issue of whether SPI would be suitable for them." -- Jimmy Kaplowitz, Wed Mar 5 15:47:50 UTC 2008 http://lists.spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-general/2008-March/002499.html Well, my memory is famously f'd-up, yet I found that within a couple of minutes. So did Jimmy Kaplowitz successfully coordinate with OpenWRT and ask our lawyers any questions last year? I think that is probably what Josh Berkus meant. Hope that helps, -- MJ Ray (slef) Webmaster for hire, statistician and online shop builder for a small worker cooperative http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ (Notice http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html) tel:+44-844-4437-237 _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list [email protected] http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
