That sounds like a sensible idea in principle for all future projects. In addition to having a lawyer review the final wording, I would suggest there be some minimum time period as well before the SPI can move earmarked funds under this clause (e.g. six months or a year)?
Peter (Open Bioinformatics Foundation secretary) On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas <zo...@spi-inc.org> wrote: > Hi, > > ... > > I would like to see something like the following added to the resolution: > > 6. In the event that the ArduPilot dissolves without defining what > SPI shall do with the managed assets or the ArduPilot becomes > provable uncontactable for SPI, the board reserves the right to assign > those assets to it's general fund. > > That maybe needs a bit of rewording as i am not a native english > speaker, but i hope everyone gets what i mean here. > > For those who are wondering, why i want this added: During our face2face > meeting earlier this year we were advised by SFLC to add a paragraph > like this to every future resolution. Otherwise if a project goes MIA or > even dissolves without giving us any notice, we cannot take their money > or other assets and use them for something else. > > Martin _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
