Filipus Klutiero writes ("Issue #4 - Make membership (more) public"):
> I request to make membership public or more public. I do not see
> what part of the information currently stored in applications could
> be private, so I think applications should be made public by
> default, but at a minimum, it should be possible for one to make its
> own applications public.
I think someone ought to be able to be a contributing member of SPI
without that necessarily being public.
Bear in mind that our contributing members are our governing body, and
might be subject to pressure from (eg) employers to vote in particular
Spi-general mailing list