On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 11:12:27AM -0400, Philippe Cloutier wrote: > On 03/10/2019 22:40, Luca Filipozzi wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 07:36:10PM -0400, Philippe Cloutier wrote: > > > I believe SPI should defer to Debian to explain such complicated stuff > > I'm fairly confident that it was Debian folks that provided that content > > in the first place. I'm happy to ask the liaison for updated text. > > Sorry, what I meant was that SPI's website should let Debian's website get > into implementation details. As soon as a description has made it clear > where a project stands relative to other associated projects, I think it has > enough information. The only value I could see in putting more information > on SPI's website would be to publish a view without the project's bias, but > I don't think Debian is trying to hide its usage of Linux. > > P.S. I didn't mean to say the issue was just SPI's fault - it could very > well be that such a text came from Debian, but removal remains one way to > solve the issue (although I agree that all other things being equal, the > more the associated project agrees with our description, the better).
I undestood you. My point is that the description of a project on the SPI website should be provided, ideally, or be approved by the project liaison. I happen to know enough about Debian to write, I hope, a good description. This isn't true of the other projects and I would seek out their liaisons. -- Luca Filipozzi _______________________________________________ Spi-general mailing list Spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general
