Hi,
Getting upstream qemu to have the patches sounds important regardless, but
I'm unclear on the first part of what you say here. Wouldn't any libraries
needed for spice by definition be used by an application?
That application would be qemu ...
This work is led by Gerd Hoffmann and can be followed in this list. We
hope to have patches that we can send to upstream qemu very soon.
I think it'd probably be productive to have the existing (or a new) yum
repository for fedora ready to go. It could hold the patched qemu, plus
RPMs of nightly snapshots of the source. Does that make sense? It's
something I could work on if it'd be helpful.
It would be great, yes. Weekly would be good enougth I think, there are
not *that* much changes flowing in at the moment.
All you need is:
(1) a recent pixman version (rebuilding the rawhide version for f12
will do).
(2) spice-protocol package
(3) spice package. You need the api.v3 branch from this repo:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~kraxel/spice/log/?h=api.v3
(4) qemu + patches. spice.v3 branch from this repo:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/spice/qemu/log/?h=spice.v3
I don't see any spec file templates in the git trees -- do you have those
internally somewhere?
There are internal repos with rhel6 bits rebuilt for fedora. I suspect
for snapshots of latest bits the rhel6-beta spec files don't help that
much ...
cheers,
Gerd
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
