Hi,
+enum {
+ SPICE_MSG_SMARTCARD_DATA = 1,
+
+ SPICE_MSG_END_SMARTCARD
+};
+
+enum {
+ SPICE_MSGC_SMARTCARD_DATA = 1,
+
+ SPICE_MSGC_END_SMARTCARD
+};
I don't think this is a good idea. This is just a chardev passthrough,
right? If so, then we should just make it that. Name it 'chardev' or
'datapipe' or something simliar. Have a additional 'init' message to
specify the kind of chardev. Then we can just reuse it when we'll have
more simliar users in the future.
Or we could make this a real interface definition where each smartcard
message gets its own message type.
Oh, and shouldn't the channel-specific messages better start with '101'
like all other channels do?
cheers,
Gerd
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
