Why did you choose to do it seperately from 29/62? On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Alon Levy <[email protected]> wrote: > --- > server/red_worker.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/server/red_worker.c b/server/red_worker.c > index 2bc0abf..d6762be 100644 > --- a/server/red_worker.c > +++ b/server/red_worker.c > @@ -1263,13 +1263,13 @@ static inline void > red_pipe_add_drawable(DisplayChannelClient *dcc, Drawable *dr > red_channel_client_pipe_add(&dcc->common.base, &drawable->pipe_item); > } > > -static inline void red_pipe_add_drawable_to_tail(RedWorker *worker, Drawable > *drawable) > +static inline void red_pipe_add_drawable_to_tail(RedChannelClient *rcc, > Drawable *drawable) > { > - if (!display_connected(worker)) { > + if (!rcc) { > return; > } > drawable->refs++; > - > red_channel_client_pipe_add_tail(worker->display_channel->common.base.rcc, > &drawable->pipe_item); > + red_channel_client_pipe_add_tail(rcc, &drawable->pipe_item); > } > > static inline void red_pipe_add_drawable_after(DisplayChannelClient *dcc, > Drawable *drawable, > @@ -6446,7 +6446,7 @@ static void > red_add_lossless_drawable_dependencies(RedWorker *worker, > > if (!sync_rendered) { > // pushing the pipe item back to the pipe > - red_pipe_add_drawable_to_tail(worker, item); > + red_pipe_add_drawable_to_tail(rcc, item); > // the surfaces areas will be sent as DRAW_COPY commands, that > // will be executed before the current drawable > for (i = 0; i < num_deps; i++) { > -- > 1.7.4.4 > > _______________________________________________ > Spice-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel >
-- Marc-André Lureau _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
