On 06/23/2011 02:10 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:18:11PM +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 05:00:10PM +0200, Alon Levy wrote:
Hi All,


Ok, so take three:

  (1) spice-protocol - remains unchanged. specifically, despite the name, will
   not contain the .proto nor the python codegen bits nor the generated files.

  (2) spice-common (repository spice/common) - new repository, contains:
   spice*.proto
   spice_codegen.py and friends (python_modules subdir)
   produces a proper shared library, used by spice-server, spice-client, 
spice-gtk, named
   libspice-common.so.0, containing marshalling and rendering code (including 
any decoder/encoder)
   plus anything else currently in common (like ssl-verify).

I think making libspice-common.so.0 will take (a bit) more work than initially expected. Note that both server/ and client/ source files #include .c files of common/ .



  (3) spice-client - breakoff client subdir from current spice (maybe 
rename+remove-the-rest to keep history)

  (4) spice-server - rename current spice repo (just to keep history)

  (5) spice-gtk - remains, just move it to freedesktop now that we want to keep 
it.

  (6) spice-all - convenience repository that has the rest as submodules and 
has a helpful makefile to build them all.


Lots of git repos.

Just a quick history scan:
0.2 -- one git to rule them all (and one big tarball)
0.4 -- a single git for server,client,common (without qxl, spicex)
       split tarballs --> ability to generate 3 different
                          tarballs for server,client,common
0.6 -- a single tarball + introducing spice-protocol
* spice-gtk repo created
0.8 -- similar to 0.6
0.10 -- splitting into 6 git repos (?).

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

Reply via email to