On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:52:28AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 07/19/2011 11:33 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > >Hi Hans, > > > >On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:20:23AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>Can we tag a 0.9.0 release from spice git master ? and release tarbals for > >>this > >>at this moment in time? If not can we make a short to do list with things > >>which > >>needs to be done before we can do this? > >
ok, so I guess that's a good idea. Just tag and release (with changelog I guess?) But what about 0.8.2 (changing subject here for a second) - I am going to try to cherry-pick anything that applies easily (read: no RedChannel stuff) or that I need for RHEL (read: async+s3). How does that sound? > >I'm all for starting the 0.10 release process as early as possible. > > > >>Also given that Fedora 16 alpha freeze is approaching, and we don't have > >>a 0.9.x yet, what is the plan for Fedora 16, stick with 0.8.x, or are > >>we going to do a 0.9.0 RSN and get it in before the freeze? > > > >Can you expand more on that? When is the alpha freeze, what does it mean if > >we get 0.9.0 in it? > > The alpha freeze is the feature freeze, not getting 0.9.x in, does not > mean much, we could still go to 0.9.x later, but we then can no longer > advertise that we're doing so as a feature. And it is more or less > discouraged to do version rebases after the feature freeze. > > >That we'll be allowed to update the package to 0.10.0 > >when it's released? > > Yes, if we get 0.9.x in we are allowed to go to 0.10.0 later. > > Regards, > > Hans > _______________________________________________ > Spice-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
