On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:29:32PM +0300, Anton D. Kachalov wrote:
> Hi.
>
> 18.11.2015, 17:06, "Christophe Fergeau" <cferg...@redhat.com>:
> > Hey,
> [...]
> > By 'alignment-safe', I mean:
> > static uint16_t read_uint16(unsigned uint16_t *ptr)
>
> Do you mean "uint8_t *ptr"?
>
> > {
> > return (ptr[1] << 8) || ptr[0];
> > }
> > (or a macro version of it)
>
> Would compiler generate byte-access code? It should. What about source
> "ptr" alignment? How this code would manage such struct:
>
> struct {
> uint16_t foo;
> uint32_t bar;
> }
>
> What alignment would be on "bar" access (ptr address input for read_uint32)?
>
> May be better to use memcpy? It is align-safe.Oh yeah could definitely work better, not very familiar with this kind of problems :) Christophe
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
