Hey, On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 06:14:52AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > Possible future changes (please comment): > - would be good if red_channel_client_wait_pipe_item_sent could work even > without the hold_item, one possible implementation is adding a fake > RedPipeItem > which when removed will set a flag causing the loop to exit (better would be > to remove the function and implement this stuff in another way, there are > only > a single call to make sure there are no pending drawing on a surface);
Yeah, I was wondering too if a fake pipe item could be used to be notified when the preceding pipe item has been sent. > - remove the RingItem and make possible to add the item to multiple clients, > this > IMHO would make stuff much easier to understand; > - remove hold_item and use always red_pipe_item_ref; Yup, I would do that, hold_item really looks like a convoluted _ref() used when not all pipe items had a refcount. > - add another callback to RedPipeItem to send the item to make all send_item > callbacks really small; It probably makes sense too, maybe longer term. I don't think this is strictly related to the bug you discussed earlier though. > - remove atomic operation on RedPipeItem reference counter, I think was added > to make sure there was no thread issues but it's just slowing down big > servers > with many cores. Imo this would need to go with annotations saying in which thread the code is running (thinking about the display thread). Probably not a huge issue right now. Christophe
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
