On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:07:18PM +0000, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > SndChannel -> SndChannelClient > SndWorker -> SndChannel
I'd expect an explanation as to why what was called a SndChannel so far really is a SndChannelClient (as it's going to inherit from RedChannelClient in the future). Ditto for SndWorker->SndChannel I'm wondering if things would be easier to follow if this was split differently, ie one commit doing SndChannel->SndChannelClient and renaming of 'channel' variables to 'client' and another commit doing SndWorker->SndChannel + variable renaming. Christophe
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
