On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 06:26:58AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > > > > I think we should replace SPICE_VERIFY / verify with G_STATIC* > > > > equivalents. > > > > > > > > > > We actually can't for compatibility reason. Some version of GLib have > > > broken macros and we still claim RHEL 6 support > > > > > > > Ah, I vaguely recall some discussion, do you have a pointer? I can't find > > changes in glib git log. > > > > I think Christophe F pointed out the problem. Don't remember exactly, I > think they were using array sizes but this do not work with C99. > Looking at current GLib master code is still using that broken > trick.
This is https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758844 Test case from the bug is int main (int argc, char **argv) { G_STATIC_ASSERT(argc == 4); return 0; } which succeeds while the macro cannot know the value of argc. Christophe
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
