On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 06:55:41AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 06:42:16AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > In this case you are introducing a regression, current code is
> > > designed to support this already. I cannot surely say that this
> > > patch is an improvement.
> > 
> > By that reasoning, any patch which makes some functions static or remove
> > some unused functions is a regression.
> > 
> > Christophe
> > 
> 
> Depends on the design. In this case is designed to be reused.

If you want
1) that the same ENABLE_EXTRA_CHECKS symbol name is reused in my v1
2) that it's globally #defined to 0/1
then yes, we are back to square 1, we should never use #ifndef/#ifdef with it,
which my suggestion and then patch was trying to address.

Christophe
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

Reply via email to