From: Christophe de Dinechin <dinec...@redhat.com>

The objective of these guidelines is that:
- We avoid introducing new warnings
- We know how to fix old ones
- We don't have to isolate whitespace changes when submitting patches,
  i.e. someone who use tools that automatically strip whitespaces and
  therefore "repairs" earlier errors should not be punished for it.

Signed-off-by: Christophe de Dinechin <dinec...@redhat.com>
---
 docs/spice_style.txt | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/docs/spice_style.txt b/docs/spice_style.txt
index ae91f987..108a57a5 100644
--- a/docs/spice_style.txt
+++ b/docs/spice_style.txt
@@ -436,3 +436,12 @@ Also in source (no header) files you must include 
`config.h` at the beginning so
 
 #include "spice_server.h"
 ----
+
+
+Compilation
+-----------
+
+The source code should compile without warnings on all variants of GCC and 
clang available.
+A patch may be rejected if it introduces new warnings.
+Warnings that appear over time due to improvements in compilers should be 
fixed in dedicated patches. A patch should not mix warning fixes and other 
changes.
+Any patch may adjust whitespace (e.g. eliminate trailing whitespace). 
Whitespace adjustments do not require specific patches.
-- 
2.13.5 (Apple Git-94)

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

Reply via email to