> On 8 Feb 2018, at 09:50, Frediano Ziglio <fzig...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> From: Christophe de Dinechin <dinec...@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe de Dinechin <dinec...@redhat.com>
>> docs/spice_style.txt | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> diff --git a/docs/spice_style.txt b/docs/spice_style.txt
>> index 3e463d2f..74f4e29d 100644
>> --- a/docs/spice_style.txt
>> +++ b/docs/spice_style.txt
>> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ If multiple related constants are to be defined, consider
>> the use of enumeration
>> Short functions
>> -Try to split code to short functions, each having simple functionality, in
>> order to improve code readability and re-usability. Prefix with inline short
>> functions or functions that were splitted for readability reason.
>> +Try to split code to short functions, each having simple functionality, in
>> order to improve code readability and re-usability. Prefix with `inline`
>> functions that were splitted for readability reason or that are very short.
>> Return on if
> I really don't understanding the aiming of both version.
> Is mixing the inline concept (optimization suggestion) with readability
> and I don't understand the reason.
OK. Needs rephrasing then. I agree I did not improve much. Will do one more
> Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel mailing list