Do we have any plans or forsee upstream wanting to use the QXL interface on any non-x86 hw (like ppc).
If so qxl.h has a lot of structs which have non-portable structure packing on non-x86 64-bit targets. uint32_t x uint64_t y ends up aligned different on different archs, on some you get uint32_t x uint32_t pad uint64_y on some the padding isn't left at all. I'm not sure if this warrants fixing these up I just noticed this problem when reading the headers and I know kernel ioctls suffers from this a lot. I'm not sure any arches do it wrong between 32/64 bit modes on the same CPU. Dave. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Spice-space-devel mailing list Spice-space-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spice-space-devel
