That sort of bracket would be best if the holes were horizontal rather
than vertical.  It would make for more camber change.  

 

With the process I used, the camber is constantly variable and not in
preset increments.  This is because the lower arms themselves are
adjustable liker a turnbuckle.

 

Joe

 

-----Original Message-----
From: James Carruthers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 9:04 AM
To: Livia Haasper
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
Subject: >>NASS Re: camber question

 

Liv,



http://www.canleyclassics.com/newproducts.asp?uid=rearwishbonemountingbr
acket

Im sure you could fabricate them yourselves...



James




Livia Haasper wrote:

>Hi everyone,
>has anyone attempted to make the lower control arms on the rear
suspension of
>the GT6 [rotoflex] adjustable to change the camber?..
>What would this do to the rotoflex coupling? We're re-assembling our
GT6 and,
>at the moment, working on the suspension. We're playing with ideas and
would
>like your opinion.
>Cheers Liv
>
>
>  
>



>> To unsubscribe send an empty email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> NASS Home Site Full Member nasshq resources http://www.nasshq.org
>> Full Membership details: http://www.nasshq.org/docs/memberapp.html





  _____  

Yahoo! Groups Links

*        To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nass/
  

*        To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  

*        Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>  Service. 

***     http://www.team.net/the-local    ***

Your messages not reaching the list?
Check out http://www.team.net/posting.html

***  unsubscribe/change address requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]  or try
***  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
***  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
***  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive
***  Edit your replies!

Reply via email to