Russell wrote:
> I've heard there really is no improvement with the 91-92 header. Otherwise,
> saturn would keep it.
Actually, that is a false statement. Part of the reason is as Joey explains with the
sound since the 91-92 header was louder than later manifolds, part
of it is cost to produce the manifolds since they are a 9-piece construction, and the
last part is that the EPA frowned on Saturn putting a stainless
steel header on a car from the factory. Your tax $$$ at work... And yes, you should
see a nice bump in mid-high range torque and hp from the 92 header
with no loss of low end. It is a well designed, good flowing, and well constructed
unit. In the future I'll be replacing my hotshot with one.
Alex Plaster
97 SC2
Visit SPOC National at http://www.spocnational.org
Don't forget to update your Profile in the Owners Database.
To unsubscribe from the list at any time, send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with any subject, and in the message text, "Unsubscribe spoc".
