In his message of 8/14/97, Jim Gilley wrote:

"I find it interesting that RN's editorial remarks clearly state that
they do NOT condone this sort of behavior. They have a fine line to
walk here, as they cannot officially condone things like
trespassing. On the other hand, many of the photos they publish are
clearly taken by trespassers, and there is no doubt about this in
anyone's mind."

Comment: This is the first time I have chimed in since I have subscribed to
SPORRS earlier this month.  I appreciate Jim Gilley’s comments and support
them as well.  I was one of the individuals that responded in the last issue
of RN.  I am sure that RN edited all my comments for size (or maybe someone
did not agree), but I thought that I would pass along the entire text.

------------------------------
To: RailNews

In my twenty-plus years of railfanning, I have had only two similar
experiences and the only conclusion that I could draw is that it was because
of the inappropriate behavior of a few bad apples.  Ironically, one was in
the Tehachapi Mountains two years ago and the other on the Delaware &
Hudson’s Penn Division (now abandoned) in 1985 during the Belden Hill (NY)
tunnel reconstruction detours.

Those of us that enjoy capturing the sense of contemporary rail images on
film are always trying to find new ways to achieve perfection.  Others are
out trying to chase a train to the ends of the earth at every location
possible.  Some become so consumed in their passion that they feel that they
are above common sense and lack respect for those around them, particularly
the railroad!  These are the bad apples!  These are the folks that you see
dashing in front of an on-coming train to reach a better vantage point,
pacing a train along a signal maintainer road, or perch themselves
precariously on a signal, need I go on?? 

I have never been a member of a train crew, but I admire the important job
that they perform and the challenges that they face.  Long hours away from
home, the danger of the job, and the fear of being unable to avoid the
potential of an accident that would injure or kill an individual.  I am sure
that you will receive many flaming responses from these folks expressing the
same.

In both of my afore mentioned situations, I witnessed one or more similar
antics, displayed by others, prior to the flame-out that I received.
Tehachapi is a Mecca for railfans and for good reason.  I enjoy going there
as often as possible, but I have noticed in two recent trips that there seems
to be an almost carnival atmosphere, particularly around The Loop.  So were
the days in ’85 around Starrucca Viaduct.  A careful ear to your scanner
revealed the truth of the matter, when you have crews or other personnel
contacting the dispatcher or railroad agents on specific situations. 

I do not profess to be an angel, but I always respect where I am.  It only
takes those few that just don’t care that ruin it for the rest.   I am sorry
to see these things happening.

As far as I am concerned, it isn’t a question of "Can’t We All Just Get
Along?", but "Why Can’t We All Be More Responsible?"



Best regards,

Rich Wallace
Flower Mound, TX

P.S.  Please tell Steve that despite all the grief, it wasn’t too smart to
respond in a profane manner back to the crew – just eat crow and move on.  
-------------------------------


"I also recall an editorial in Trains a few years back about 
trespassing. This was a total BS editorial, as it basically read 'you 
better not trespass -- I did, but that's ok because I don't now' 
which pretty much translates to 'hey, I'm a hypocrite, but that's ok 
because I got my pictures, and you be damned'."

Comment: I also replied to Trains, though not published, and suggested that
more than 80% of the images published in that issue alone were (probably)
taken from a location that required the photographer to trespass.  Speaking
out of both sides of one’s mouth???
----------------------------------
  

"Now, before you accuse me of being 'holier than thou', yes, I DO
trespass. I find it very hard to take pictures without trespassing.
Yet, I do TRY to obtain permission when I can, and I always leave
without creating a scene when asked to. Furthermoe, I take great
care not to cause damage to private property. No, this does NOT
justify my behavior. See, I don't try to rationalize my acts. I KNOW
they are wrong, and I accept that, and I understand that in theory,
I could be fined or jailed as a result of what I do. It's sort of
like speeding -- it's illegal and dangerous, but we all do it
anyway."

Comment: I agree 100% - This is great advise.  Back when I lived in New
Jersey, a group of us used to visit Sand Patch on a regular basis and camp on
the east side of the horseshoe at Mance, PA in a clearing near a stand of
small pines.  The actual camp site location varied, but we were usually along
a farm owned by John Brant.  Brant, while suspicious at first, always granted
permission to poke around the property and almost found it amusing that we
would drive five or six hours to photograph trains.  We were always friendly
and respected his property (i.e., did not break out the bow saw).  The area
was always left clean, we never drove around like absolute idiots (well,
almost always) and the relationship between railfans and Brant was fine.  I
was sorry to hear from one of my journeyman, Scott Snell, that Brant is now
reached a point where he had to be put in a nursing home.

--------------------------------------

"Thankfully, I've never had an ugly encounter like this. Call me a 
pussy, but if this happened to me, I would probably just tuck my tail 
and leave without offering resistance. Seems like the right thing to 
do, even if it isn't very satisfying."

Comment: That is the best advise, whether you get ripped a new one or not.
 If you are on the property and don’t have permission, take your lumps and
don’t provoke further problems.
-------------------------------
I step down off my soap box, next?



Rich Wallace
Flower Mound, TX


--> SPORRS: Serious Photographers of Railroad Related Subjects



--> SPORRS: Serious Photographers of Railroad Related Subjects

X-Mozilla-Status: 0011
Content-Length: 2391


Reply via email to