Heck, in order to make my photos different from everyone else's photos, I
purposely try to get headlight flares!  The more flare glare, the better,
I say.  I breathe on the lens, shoot at small apertures to create
headlight stars, aim the camera at the sun or ditch lights, and use zoom
lenses with complex glass groupings (e.g. Nikon 50~300mm) to get internal
lens flares for interesting effects.  At other times you will see me
using long bellows lens hoods, black aluminum foil, gobos or just my hand
to block light from hitting my front optic--it just depends on the effect
I want with that particular subject.

I have never sat down and shot side-by-side comparisons of headlight
flare with differing brands of film, as I have used Fuji VelVeeta almost
exclusively for nearly ten years, and I made the change from old friend
Kodachrome in an instant (while playing the Vapors song "Turning
Japanese" on a boombox at the office for maximum effect!). I do remember
getting a beautiful peach-colored glow around headlights with K-64 on
sunny days with a back-lighted diesel that I no longer get with Fuji
Cheezychrome.

I am attempting to create drama and produce a memorable photo that jumps
out at you and grabs you by the eyeballs.  I do not give a hang about a
lot of conventional concerns that most railfan photographers have,
because I am not trying to record the subject (let's say, a train) with
absolutely dead-on color rendition or devoid of some visual effect
through the creative application of lenses of differing focal lengths.

In the old days of the early 1970s we had to have extremely accurate
color rendition of clients' products (say, bricks or bathroom tiles) for
a catalog, so we shot them on CC-filtered 4x5 color negative film, and
then hauled the bricks (or whatever) to the photo lab so that their
printers could match the colors in the prints as closely as possible to
the original bricks.  It is what the client needed, but, boy, was that
ever boring to me.  Those rectangular photos of each brick color/texture
reproduced in the catalogs did not reach out and grab my eyeballs, but
maybe they grabbed the eyeballs of some architect or some other person in
the construction business.  I doubt it very much.  I vowed that if I ever
got out of that place I would attempt to be as creative as possible with
my photos, so some headlight flare does not bother me.

If all I am going to do with my camera is record the scene exactly as it
appears (as if that were possible!), then I would be nothing more than a
mirror of reality.  That would be extremely boring for me as my purpose
in life is to be creative, whether it be with a camera, paintbrush,
keyboard, or just my thoughts. Like with the bricks, at times one must
record exactly what one sees for the client, but I always do my best work
when I am my own client. 

So most times you will find me off in another spot away from the crowd,
climbing up on something high, crawling on my belly in the mud or wading
through the water in order to find that different spot where all visual
elements come together to make a great photo.  Most times my cameras and
I get filthy, or wet or scratched in getting to these new vistas, and
then sometimes I see that the shot will not be as great as I had thought
it would be.  That's OK, as I have eliminated one more possible angle for
my photo and can concentrate on getting the shot from another
location...maybe over here so that I can get a little more headlight
flare.

John B. Corns



--> SPORRS: Serious Photographers of Railroad Related Subjects

X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
Content-Length: 4719



Reply via email to