I just flipped my Union Pacific calendar one page too far yesterday when
changing the month, and I noticed the really killer shot for the month of
November by someone named Olev Taremea.  Nice and artsy; my kind of shot. 
Good backlit silhouette profile with minimal lens flare.  Then I noticed
the horn bolted on backwards!  Nothing like an innovative and efficient
company moving forward.  I would have flipped it around in Photoshop.  (The
horn, not the
corporation).  :)

Here is some food for thought for the foundation of this list.  The
photographers.  You bolt counters, train spotters, historians and symbol
loggers will be lost after the next few sentences.

Backlit images.  I know that some of you don't care for them.  "What's one
man's trash is another man's gold".  Or the inverted version.  Perhaps no
style or category of railroad imagery is more controversial.  You've got
your basic 'pastel' overcast drudgery and your night shot 'light in the
darkness'
exemplifications of creativity in an otherwise sea of sunny day (used to
be) mostly Kodachromes, to add 'contrast' or 'snap' to the admittedly
otherwise commonplace wedgie variations and that occasional broadside that
fill our slide shows and fan magazines.  Possibly it is because they are
more difficult to accurately portray on paper that we shy away from
submitting or even shooting such contrasty images, but I have seen some
real art content derive from this type of dramatic light usage.  We are
photographers.  After all, it is admitting creative defeat to forgo
recording a certain type of image before us on film that looks so
spectacular to us in person merrily because we are intimidated by the
exposure latitude range or uncertain of the results.  And certain films
will help contribute to the success of these results or they will induce
failure from all but the most carefully planned compromise.  But this is
why we all have different film choices available to us. 

When dramatic lighting is used with taste and sparingly, I believe that we 
can inject even more 'punch' and variety to our railroad photography and
presentations by bringing our viewers and audiences deeper into the realm 
of real world railroading in the great outdoors.  We can bring our viewers
to a
distant location and pull them into the picture with our scene.  We can do
this
with forethought and creativity and add impact and interest to our work
with 
dramatic images, or we can 'jostle' the viewer back to reality of into
another 
season with the shock of your favorite bright white snow scene immediately 
following the deep tones of that great sunrise or sunset silhouette from
last month.  

It is a shame to judge and 'rate' a photographer on only one image type.  
Especially if it is a type that you personally choose not to include in
your style or agree with.  No one wants to sit through a whole carousel of 
'contrasty' backlit shots, but when used in conjunction with other images
or to tell a story or set a mood, this 'mistake' or 'trash' to some can
make
the difference between a lasting impression and just another barrage of
trains 
flying by on predictable sunny weekends.

How many ways is there to watch a train go by and how many of those ways 
that you can think of have you captured on film.  Think about this for a
minute 
and where you have been recently.  I bet you just got at least one new
idea.  
With respect to our own hobby, how many 'correctly' lit 'formula' pictures
can 
we handle without losing interest or becoming so consumed in our own quests
for 'perfection' that we loose all sight of what we set out to create to
begin with?  Which brings me to just that: What is it that we are trying to
create; pictures to
please everyone else, or images that we ourselves enjoyed creating and
reliving
in memories each time that we view them again?                

I was digging through some of my older shots recently and looking for the
'artsy' ones for a project.  I found quite a few more than I thought I had.
For some reason I remember where I was, what I was doing, how cold or hot
it was and who I was with when I shot them.  And I can't label my sunny
Santa Fe (Oops, BNSF) shots from last month without playing back my taped
notes already.

I enjoy the bulk of the tastefully done "Ooh, it's so orangy" shots that I
see in slide presentations, and I know that you all have your own favorite
styles and admirations.  Whatever they are, I hope you don't let other's
opinions and preconceptions limit you from recording them on film if you
wish.  Looking for something new when you go out to shoot?  Imposing self 
inflicted limits on your own potential or taking too much stock in other's 
opinions won't get you there.  And the term "specialized creativity" is an 
oxymoron.  You won't shoot it because you said that you don't like "that 
kind of shot"?  Can you be that confident of what the images that you
didn't shoot would look like?  And you have a personal library of failed 
attempts at these types of images to prove your point?  Striving to be 
"selectively creative" is a contradiction of terms.  Specialization is a 
business practice.

I'm looking for striking scenes through my viewfinder to convert to images.
I can't get too enthusiastic these days about dragging the gear out again
just to go add to the last fifteen years worth of 'standard' shots, but by
remaining observant of my surroundings and looking for something different
when I do go out, railroad photography remains and interesting exercise in
creativity for me.  And what other primary reason can we state as our
motivation for returning trackside time and time again?

On a closing note, isn't it amazing how we continually hear about the
railroads being 'filled to capacity', yet we can wait all afternoon and
watch the rails rust?  Damn, almost strayed into another subject matter. 
Nit-picking is surely another topic entirely.  And one best practiced by
the nit's original creator. :)

Regards,

Dave Cohen
Photographer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--> SPORRS: Serious Photographers of Railroad Related Subjects


Reply via email to