>>From an observation of all of the latest grumblings about what is wrong
with everything from railroad related magazines and AF everything cameras,
I have been trying to understand the attitude or mentality of railfans in
general.  Just about every discussion is concerned with what is wrong with
something.  There is very little positive mentioned.  Is it just a need to
provoke a conversation, or is there a unified message here of what kind of
person is lured to photographing trains?

If you would take the same approach to other topics as has been directed to
AF everything cameras, it would appear something like the following:

"I just experimented with using my brand new Binford 36" pipe wrench to
drive new 1.5" 4d finishing nails while installing the new trim work in the
remodeling project on my house.  The damn thing kept bending the nails,
wouldn't drive them in straight, and created huge dents in the wood work
requiring hours of time filling and sanding smooth the resulting holes.

I sent some of the nails off to a local lab for testing and some to a
national recognized lab also.  The results from both labs were almost the
same.  The metal of all tested nails had the tensile strength within the
recommended guidelines, so the problem has to be with the design of the
Binford 36" pipe wrench.

Binford really blew it this time coming out with a 36" pipe wrench that
can't be used for anything other than tightening pipes.  What could they
have been thinking of?  Is anyone interested in buying a worthless piece of
junk before I sell it at Karchmers Iron and Metal for scrap?"

Like any tool, AF everything cameras can and will be confused in certain
situations.  Just like any other tool.  But for 90% of the time, or better,
they can and will perform their designed functions faster and better than
the photographer.  Any photographer!  What separates the good photographers
from the average, is they know when and where to over-ride the camera to
compensate for what may be confusing for the camera to interpret ate.

If you are out shooting trains at a given location and you have the time to
analyse the exposure and pre focus for the shot you have in mind, why would
you want to leave the camera on auto-everything?  Preset and pre focus it
and lock it in!  That is taking advantage of the camera's abilities.  When
you don't have the time to do all of these things, then leave the camera on
auto-everything.  That is taking advantage of the camera's abilities.

I have given examples before, but here is the latest one.  The shot that
was selected as the grand prize winner on the BNSF '97 calendar is a good
example of the advantage of auto-focus everything cameras.  I am not
usually a run-and-gun shooter.  I prefer to pick a location and wait.  It
allows more time to compose the shot and besides is much more relaxing to
the photographer.  The latter is a prime concern for me.  

However, when the unexpected comes up, like a consist of new paint scheme
locomotives, the effort to get-the-shot can require the run-and-gun
approach.  The shot in question was such a situation.  I had visualized a
shot the day before with the light conditions and location being placed in
a mental log of possibilities.  When the consist of freshly painted new
locomotives showed up unexpectedly, I immediately decided to try and get
them at the location noted the day before.  I drove down the highway at
high speed, but with existing traffic conditions was unable to gain on the
train as much as I thought I would.  I was barely ahead of the train which
ran basically parallel to the paved highway.  I turned off of the paved
highway down a dirt road running perpendicular to the tracks.  At this
particular location the tracks and highway were about as far apart as they
get.  I was doing in excess of 60 mph down the dirt road when I came over
the hill.  The train was almost at the spot I wanted to shoot it.  Before
the car came to a complete stop, I was grabbing my camera sitting on the
seat next to me and opening my door.  When the car finally managed to slide
to a stop, the train was there!!!!!  I swung the camera up, zoomed in and
squeezed the trigger firing off about six to eight shots.  There was
absolutely no time to focus or determine the optimum exposure.  But, I got
the shot.  A good shot.

Was I just lucky?  Does this make me less of a photographer?  The answer to
both questions is NO.   It was "I" who determined the location, angle, and
composition that I wanted the day before.  And it was also "I" that
determined that the light conditions were such that this was an ideal time
for shooting at that particular location.  And it was "I" who determined
that I wanted to shoot from farther away from the road crossing between a
few clumps of brush.  Did the group of four or five railfans standing next
to the crossing get a good shot?  Possibly.  But not the shot that I got.

Would it have been a better picture if I had the time to determine the
optimum exposure using a separate light meter?  No.  The exposure was
correct.  Would it have been a better picture if I had the time to pre
focus?  No.  The focus was correct also.  So what could have improved the
shot?  Nothing.  I was already using the best tools I had available to me.
And I used them to my advantage.

When I have more time, I will use these same tools to determine the
exposure I want and to pre-focus on the location I want to shoot.  I will
then lock the camera in on these settings and patiently wait for the train
to come to that location.  Here again, I am taking advantage of the best
tools I have available to me to determine the desired exposure for that
particular shot.

My goal has always been to get the best possible picture "I" can.  I don't
care how "I" get it or what tools "I" get it with.  It just doesn't matter
to me.  As long as "I" get the shot.

So let's try to get the conversation on a more positive note.  What can we
do to get a better shot or where can we go to get a better shot.  The
subjects may be the same as has been discussed, but we can approach them on
a positive note instead of the constant negativism.



-> SPORRS: Serious Photographers of Railroad Related Subjects
-> Web Site: http://www.anet-stl.com/acphotog/sporrs

X-Mozilla-Status: 8001
Content-Length: 2625


Reply via email to