=======================================================
-> This is The 'SPORRS' Mailing List
-> Info File: http://www.anet-stl.com/acphotog/sporrs/infosporrs.htm
-> Note: Remember to include your name in each list post or reply.
-> Please delete all unnecessary quoted text from the original message!
=======================================================

At 10:49 AM 5/7/98 -0500, you wrote:

>    I think this last point is important and often overlooked by us.  I
>suspect there are shots posted on the page that look bland and flat, but
>look real nice in person.  This difference is I suspect directly related
>to the art of scanning.  I've watched Dave scan some of my shots and get
>real creative with color tables in order to tweak the shot into looking
>like the slide.  The process of working with these color tables and
>layers is every bit as critical as the actual exposure.  Not to poke fun
>at anyone in particular but I think this forum would benefit from seeing
>the same slide scanned by two or three different SPORR contributors and
>then post the shots up on the site for comparison.  This would
>illustrate the difference between scanner, photo shop software, and the
>artistic eye of the person doing the work.

  Unfortunately, there's one other element over which the scanner 
artist has little control - the machine the viewer uses to view 
the image.  I discovered just how great the variation from
system to system can be when I was putting together some simple
web pages a few months ago.  I took the images off my PhotoCD and
played with the brightness/contrast until they looked "right" on 
my display.  After the pages were up on the site, I went around 
to various other computers to see how the pages looked.  To my 
surprise, the images looked washed-out on most of the machines I 
tried, and the color registration varied greatly as well.  As I
browse the web, I often come across pictures that look dark or just
"funny."  I used to wonder what the web authors were thinking, but 
now I wonder if they were just tweeking their pictures until they 
looked "right" on their systems, too.


--  ____
____IOOI__I___________   /|        Evan Werkema       I\  
  |     O     O  O |    | |        Berkeley, CA       I | 
|_|______ATSF______|_|__| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] I |_
`-'O==O  ====  O==O`-'   O==O"""""""""""""""""""""""O==O

=======================================================
-> SPORRS: 'Serious Photographers Of Railroad Related Subjects'
-> Web Site: http://www.anet-stl.com/acphotog/sporrs/
-> Message © 1998 SPORRS® - All Rights Reserved
=======================================================


Reply via email to