I read the recent posting describing Dr Tarnopolsky's comments on 
creatine and the subsequent postings on the relationship between 
creatine and cancer, or rather the lack of, with interest. This was a 
fairly emphatic statement that, in the authors opinion outlined in 
bold text, creatine does not cause cancer.

While it does seem unlikely that creatine is directly carcinogenic, 
as a clincian and scientist I would be fairly cautious about 
such absolute statements that this is a completely impossible 
scenario. Almost nothing is known about the true pathogenesis of 
cancer, if we did we would have found a cure. Therefore, one cannot 
rule out any agent or chemical or substance as possibly having a 
link to the early changes in a cell from normal to cancerous.

Dr Tarnopolsky quotes studies that have shown no link to cancer, but 
it is always difficult to assess what the long term risks inolved 
in ingesting any supplement or even basic food compound are. Creatine 
has not been around long enough for detailed epidemiological studies 
to be performed, and side effects may take decades to become obvious. 
Thus, I cannot see how anyone can say with complete certainty that 
any such substance has no capacity to be carcinogenic.

As is always the case when someone comes from a particular paradigm 
or prejudice, instead of stating the facts, Dr Tarnopolsky subtly 
attacks the messenger, in this way casting doubt on the assertions. 
For example, apparently a persons opinion is more acceptable if they 
are a "Dr" rather than a "Mr", if they have "credentials" we can 
observe and if they have "published a paper in a peer reviewed 
journal." Yes, a scientist or individual must challenge an 
assertion one does not agree with, and give a good argument why it is 
not sound, but these tactics make it difficult to accept Dr 
Tarnopolskies more cogent later analysis as not coming from a 
particular fixed paradigm.

The only certainty in the creatine debate, and indeed most of the  
food supplement field, is that a lot more work and time is needed to 
gain further clarity on these issues.

Best wishes
Zig St Clair Gibson
_
Dr Alan St Clair Gibson, MBChB, PhD
Exercise Science Unit
University of Cape Town
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--------
View all messages at http://sportsci.org/forum.  Click on the links 
to JOIN, UNJOIN, alter MAIL OPTIONS, or get INFO/HELP on acceptable 
messages. 

Reply via email to