While I appreciate the ongoing emails with new designs and graphics, I think we might be running a little ahead of ourselves here.
So far, the only discussion on structure was the email from Neal and that discussion seemed pretty minimal. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to dis the contributions, but I'm a little concerned that there are no specs (that I'm aware of) that say what specific functionality requirements exist. That is, there is no sense of the blueprints with use cases, no requirements, no set-out that says, we're going to do this. As I see it, and please, feel free to disagree with my analogy, but imagine that spread-ubuntu is a car. At the moment we're discussing what shape the mirrors have and what colour to paint the bumpers, but there has been no discussion about how much load capacity it has, what fuel consumption, which buyers, how many wheels, what shape, etc. While it feels great to discuss the colours, it doesn't actually build a car that others can use. Of course there might be documentation that I missed, in which case, can someone please point me to it? -- Onno Benschop Connected via Optus B3 at S31°54'06" - E115°50'39" (Yokine, WA) -- ()/)/)() ..ASCII for Onno.. |>>? ..EBCDIC for Onno.. --- -. -. --- ..Morse for Onno.. ITmaze - ABN: 56 178 057 063 - ph: 04 1219 8888 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~spreadubuntu Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~spreadubuntu More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
