Alvaro, > Hi! > > This message officially starts the call for adoption for > draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement. > > Please indicate your position about adopting this use cases draft > by end-of-day on March 27, 2014. > > Some additional background: We had issued a call for adoption for > draft-filsfils-rtgwg-segment-routing-use-cases-02 back in November. > From both the discussion at the meeting in Vancouver and on the > list, there was consensus to adopt. The authors published > draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement-00 as a revision to the > original draft without the solution being present in the use case > description. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement > > Thanks!
Section 3 of draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement presents IGP-based MPLS tunnels as a use case for SPRING. Since SPRING is about source/explicitly routed tunnels, then the use case of IGP-based tunnels is outside the scope of SPRING. After all, these IGP-based tunnels are *not* source/explicitly routed. Yakov. _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
