Hi Yakov, indeed. It's part of a problem statement that describes how networks are deployed today and how these network may benefit from a SR solution.
So, to me, it looks the right place for this description to be. s. On Apr 2, 2014, at 7:46 PM, Yakov Rekhter wrote: > Stefano, > > Section 5.1.2 contains plenty of material that is not use cases. > > E.g., section 5.1.2.1 describes capacity planning process, but > not a particular use case. Such description is outside the scope > of the use case document. > > E.g., section 5.1.2.2.1 goes into comparison between the scheme > where traffic engineering is done by distributed CSPF and the scheme > where it is done by using centralized computation for dynamically > setting/adjusting IGP metrics based on the traffic load and for > computing paths for explicitly routed tunnels. Such comparison is > outside the scope of the use case document. > > Yakov. > _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
