Hi Yakov, I this stage of the process, I don't see why we would need to split the problem-statement draft so I'd strongly suggest to keep the document as it is (with all comments being addressed) and move on, knowing the support the WG already gave on this draft.
Thanks. s. On Apr 4, 2014, at 8:54 PM, Yakov Rekhter wrote: > Alvaro and John, > > The SPRING WG charter asks for "One or more documents describing > SPRING use cases". > > Give that, could you, as the SPRING WG co-chairs, comment on whether > the SPRING use cases document(s) should cover just the use cases, or > should also include the SPRING architecture requirements. > > Yakov. > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
