Hi Yakov, On Apr 18, 2014, at 7:23 PM, Yakov Rekhter wrote: > Stefano, > >> Hi Yakov, >> >> On Apr 4, 2014, at 10:53 PM, Yakov Rekhter wrote: >>> Stefano, >>> >>>> All, >>>> >>>> this is the new version of the problem-statement draft incorporating >>>> the latest comments. >>> >>> Section 5.1.1.2 is clearly an improvement over what was in the >>> previous version, although some text is still problematic. >>> Specifically, "C only installs the path via AS2 in its RIB." If it >>> is the Adj-RIB-Out, then C wouldn't be able to advertise the path >>> via AS3 inside AS1 (as this path is not in the Adj-RIB-Out). And >>> if it is the Loc-RIB, then the Adj-RIB-Out would have only the path >>> via AS2 (as the Adj-RIB-Out is populated from the Loc-RIB), and C >>> would not be able to advertise the path via AS3 inside AS1. Either >>> way, this would contradict the assumption that "C propagates all >>> the paths to Z within AS1 (add-path)." >> >> >> I'll address your BGP concerns on a separate thread. > > The only problem with the text in 5.1.1.2 in the -02 version of the > draft is the following sentence "C only installs the path via AS2 > in its RIB." To fix to this problem the sentence should say that > "C may install in its FIB only the route via AS2, or only the route > via AS3, or both." The rest of the text in 5.1.1.2 in the -02 version > is ok. > > Instead, section 5.1.1.2 in the -03 version of the draft contains > completely different text, which brings up a whole bunch of new > questions. > > To facilitate timely progress of this document I would suggest to > replace the new text in 5.1.1.2 with the text that was there in the > -02 version plus the fix I suggested above.
if you feel your concerns were better addressed by the previous text (with your modification), I don't mind put it back so to make progress with the draft. I'll re-spin the draft tomorrow. Happy Easter. Thanks. s. > Yakov. > _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
