Folks,
We will adopt all three use case documents as WG items. There was "rough
consensus" for adoption and ample scope for revision once they are published as
WG documents:
- draft-previdi-spring-problem-statement
- draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6-use-cases
- draft-francois-spring-resiliency-use-case
Authors, please resubmit the documents as draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement,
draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases, and draft-spring-resiliency-use-cases,
respectively.
WG members, please provide specific suggestions for changes to these working
group documents. We would like to get through the editing and revision process
as fast as we reasonably can (though not faster :-).
Onward!
Thanks,
--John and Alvaro
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
