If your SR segments are to be engineered by set of SR headers for a given FEC and anywhere in the network you will suddenly choose LDP learned label for a given FEC the forwarding results will be rather poor don't you think ?
r. On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Xuxiaohu <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert, > >> -----邮件原件----- >> 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Robert Raszuk >> 发送时间: 2014年5月21日 15:25 >> 收件人: Xuxiaohu >> 抄送: Hannes Gredler; Yakov Rekhter; [email protected]; Alvaro Retana (aretana); >> John G. Scudder >> 主题: Re: [spring] draft-gredler-spring-mpls-05.txt as SPRING WG document >> >> Xiaohu, >> >> > Since there are just label distribution protocols which don't affect >> > the route selection at all, why do you care about that consistency among >> routers? >> >> We are talking about label selection and not route selection. >> >> This is about the same FEC so same route hence route selection does not come >> to >> the picture. > > Sure. Then what's the problem if there is inconsistency of label selection > among routers (e.g., some routers prefer label bindings learnt from ISIS > while others prefer label bindings learnt from LDP)? > > Best regards, > Xiaohu > >> Thx, >> R. > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
