These documents have been going through multiple reviews and are ready to ask for WG adoption afais.
On 20/05/14 11:00, "Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)" <[email protected]> wrote: >Dear WG members and co-chairs, > >after the adoption of draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement I'd like to >submit >to your consideration the following documents that has been presented >already >at multiple occasions (IETF87, IETF88 and IETF89): > >1. >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-use-cases >-00 >The WG already expressed consensus and support to the document during >IETF88 but >its adoption to WG item has been deferred due to the work on the problem >statement draft. > >2. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-01 >This document is the base description of the SR technology and >terminology. It >has updated to the latest state of the agreement on SR from all the >co-authors >(vendors and operators). The draft has been simplified and focuses on the >SR terminology and applicability to existing dataplanes. It clearly >describes >how SR fits within the MPLS architecture and IPv6 architecture. > >3. >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-mpls-01 >The document describes the instantiation of SR on the MPLS dataplane. The >draft has been updated with some illustration examples so to show how SR >operates on top of MPLS and how MPLS dataplane is used "as is", i.e., >without >any modification. > >4. >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-ldp-inter >op-01 >This document describes the interoperability between SR and LDP in order >to >ease gradual deployments and co-existence between SR and legacy LDP >control >plane. > >5. >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-francois-spring-segment-routing-ti-lfa-00 >This document outlines the SR solution for a Topology Independent LFA >strategy. >It addresses the use case and requirement described in >draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases-00 > >As a reminder, Segment Routing protocol extensions are described in: >. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-00 > WG Item in ISIS working group >. >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-extensions-04 > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extens >ion-01 > in OSPF working group >. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-02 > in PCE working group > >The scope of this email is to bring these documents to your attention in >order >to validate the consensus and support the authors require prior to >request >their adoption as WG items to the WG-chairs. > > >Thanks. >s. > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >spring mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
