I have a question about this draft. In section 2, it has the following statement: >>>
>From a SPRING viewpoint, we would like to highlight the following requirement: the two configured paths T1 and T2 MUST NOT benefit from local protection. >>> But there is no such statement in subsequent sections. So suppose I have a data packet using SPRING to use path A - B - C. If B is down, would such packets be discarded or would there be an attempt to get it to C if one of the other methods for repair is configured? Anoop On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 9:35 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking > Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Use-cases for Resiliency in SPRING > Authors : Pierre Francois > Clarence Filsfils > Bruno Decraene > Rob Shakir > Filename : draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases-00.txt > Pages : 8 > Date : 2014-05-12 > > Abstract: > This document describes the use cases for resiliency in SPRING > networks. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-resiliency-use-cases-00 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > spring mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
