Dear Alvaro, Would there be any opportunity to discuss SPRING OpenFlow interworking during the Toronto (IETF-90) mtg.?
It may be useful to include a statement like the following sentence in Sec. 6 (Interoperability with non-SPRING nodes) of the SPRING problem statement draft (draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-01.txt). "Interoperability with openFlow (https://www.opennetworking.org/sdn -resources/onf-specifications/openflow) based non-SPRING nodes will be discussed in a future document." Many thanks in advance. Best. Bhumip Bhumip Khasnabish ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ [spring] I-D Action: draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-01.txt ------------------------------ - *From*: internet-drafts at ietf.org <[email protected]> - *To*: i-d-announce at ietf.org <[email protected]> - *Cc*: spring at ietf.org <[email protected]> - *Date*: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 06:09:12 -0700 - *List-id*: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring. ietf.org <http://spring.ietf.org>> ------------------------------ A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Source Packet Routing in Networking Working Group of the IETF. Title : SPRING Problem Statement and Requirements Authors : Stefano Previdi Clarence Filsfils Bruno Decraene Stephane Litkowski Martin Horneffer Ruediger Geib Rob Shakir Robert Raszuk Filename : draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-01.txt Pages : 18 Date : 2014-06-26 Abstract: The ability for a node to specify a forwarding path, other than the normal shortest path, that a particular packet will traverse, benefits a number of network functions. Source-based routing mechanisms have previously been specified for network protocols, but have not seen widespread adoption. In this context, the term 'source' means 'the point at which the explicit route is imposed'. This document outlines various use cases, with their requirements, that need to be taken into account by the Source Packet Routing in Networking (SPRING) architecture for unicast traffic. Multicast use- cases and requirements are out of scope of this document. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement/ There's also a htmlized version available at:http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-01 A diff from the previous version is available at:http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-spring-problem-statement-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
