Hi John, I already ack'ed Andrew' s comments and will address them asap.
Thanks. s. -----Original Message----- From: John Scudder [[email protected]] Received: Tuesday, 11 Nov 2014, 9:48 To: Andrew G. Malis [[email protected]]; Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil) [[email protected]]; Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) [[email protected]] CC: [email protected] [[email protected]]; [email protected] [[email protected]]; [email protected] [[email protected]]; [email protected] [[email protected]]; {[email protected]} [[email protected]] Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] Routing Directorate QA review of draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-04 Andy, Thanks very much for doing this review. Authors, Can you please (at minimum) acknowledge that you've received Andy's comments and (preferably) respond to them, either by updating the draft or by discussing them on the SPRING list? For what it's worth, I've read through Andy's review and agree with his points. Thanks, --John On Oct 6, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Andrew G. Malis <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate QA reviewer for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-04 . The Routing Directorate QA reviews are intended to improve the quality of RTG Area documents as the pass through the IETF process. This is the QA review at the time of the WG document adoption poll. Document: draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-04.txt Reviewer: Andy Malis Review Date: 2014-10-06 Working Group Adoption Poll end date: Oct 8, 2014 Intended Status: Standards Track Please find the review at: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/WG%20adoption%20QA%20review%20draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing Cheers, Andy
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
