On Nov 18, 2014, at 10:59 PM, Uma Chunduri wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > =============== > >At this stage there's no need to have shorter sid 's for ipv6 also because > >the current use > > cases afdressed by existing implementations do not require any igp anyway. > I meant "igp extensions" of course... > s. > ================= > > We have IGP extensions for MPLS data plane (even for IPv6) but I saw some > extensions for IPv6 data plane? > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-03 > > > Section 2.2 > > An ipv6 address SID is encoded in 16 octets (IPv6 Adj-SID is defined > in [I-D.previdi-6man-segment-routing-header]). > > Could you please clarify? I presume this is only for IPv6 ADJ SIDs?
correct. As I stated in my original email, the use-case we are working at does not require any igp extension because it's more about using sr as an overlay on top of an infrastructure. s. > > -- > Uma C. > > > > _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
