hi stefano, On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:14:20AM +0000, Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) wrote: [ ... ] | > | SP> why not creating a new thread explaining the issue and including isis and spring wg ? | > | > HG> thats a good suggestion - please do it ! - | > HG> we need to be clear on the protocol requirements *before* adding | > HG> protocol extensions. | | SP> well, we agreed already at multiple occasions (last one was during the meeting in Dallas | SP> where you and me agreed to add MT support to the Binding TLV) so we're inline with the process, right ?
again this is meant as a friendly reminder to document (e.g. in some of the SPRING documents where you have the pen) how you want to intend to use the MT extensions for the binding TLV. its not yet clear to me and i'd like to get an answer on this before progressing the protocol extensions in the ISIS and OSPF working groups. /hannes _______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
