+1 From: Shraddha Hegde <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 8:58 AM To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Uma Chunduri <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Pushpasis Sarkar <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Hannes Gredler <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: RE: [spring] Modeling SRGB configuration for draft-ietf-spring-sr-yang
[Shraddha] route preference is local to router and the neighbor never knows what the other is going to choose. If there are inconsistencies in two protocols, there are going to be loops even when they use same SRGB. Keeping different labels makes it easier to troubleshoot.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
