Hi Acee,

On 8/3/15, 4:11 PM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi Pushpasis, 
>
>On 8/3/15, 6:13 AM, "spring on behalf of Pushpasis Sarkar"
><[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Hi Les,       
>>
>>On 8/1/15, 4:56 AM, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>What is more problematic is supporting multiple labels for the same
>>>prefix - which is one of the consequences of the per-protocol SRGB
>>>approach. I am not saying this is unsupportable - just that it is a more
>>>difficult problem to solve.
>>[Pushpasis] If we can support multiple protocol routes (each providing an
>>IP next hop) per IP prefix, I don¹t see why there should be problem
>>supporting multiple protocol routes (each providing a labeled next hop)
>>for the same IP prefix.
>
>In the simple next-hop case, only the most preferred protocol (lowest
>admin distance or precedence) route will be installed in the data plane.
[Pushpasis] You are right as long the route we are talking is the IP/V6
prefix applicable on the ingress which encapsulates an incoming IP/V6
packet into the MPLS packet. What we are saying is that all routers
participating in SR with multiple protcols (whenever there is at all a
need) can setup parallel MPLS data planes and the ingress can inject the
incoming IP/V6 packets into a MPLS data plane of their choice indicated by
the protocol preference.

>If I understand correctly, in this case the most preferred protocol would
>install the NHLFE and a cross-connect. Additionally, other less preferred
>protocols would install additional cross-connects using different labels.
>Correct?
[Pushpasis] Yes that is correct for a given ingress router. However if the
protocol preference is different on different ingress routers (which might
be the case in migration scenarios) they are pushed in using different
MPLS labels.

> 
>
>Thanks,
>Acee
>
>
>>
>>Thanks
>>-Pushpasis
>>> 
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>spring mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>

_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring

Reply via email to