Hi Gaurav, Looks like you are asking the routers to forward looking at the second innermost label and not the topmost label. This does NOT fit into the MPLS architecture. I am not sure it fits SR-IPV6 architecture or not, but I doubt.
Looks like your requirement is that each node on shortest path to the final destination (indicated by the bottom-most Node-segment) provide some service. In this regard, can you be specific about wether all the nodes will provide the same service or different service? It does not make sense to me for all the transit nodes to execute the same service on the packet. So if they are not required to provide the same service on each transit node, question is how one service label will be enough to indicate which specific service will need to be executed at each node. Hope you have gone through SFC drafts already. Thanks -Pushpasis From: spring on behalf of Gaurav agrawal Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 6:09 PM To: Alexander Vainshtein Cc: "Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)", "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>", "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>", Vinod Kumar S 70786 Subject: Re: [spring] [SPRING] Query related to SR Architecture Dear Alexander, Thanks for your inputs. Let me further elaborate on the subject. The requirement is to make every node on the path to destination to perform a specific service(Service could be anything). Currently Service label can only follow a Node Label, because of which to let every node perform same service, SR Label stack expects to have node and service label for each transit node, this results in huge label stack. If we can push a service label prior to node label & each intermediate node can perform below operation: 1) Pop Service Label & perform/schedule the service. 2) Decide the further forwarding based on Node Label 3) Push the service label back to stack. With this we needn’t repeat the service label for each transit node thereby making the SR Label stack COMPACT. We can derive many optimized implementation by having this. So, we would like to hear from You and MPLS/SPRING community about our view point. Thanks and Regards, Gaurav Agrawal [Company_logo] Mobile: +91-7838700296 Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. From: Alexander Vainshtein [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 5:01 PM To: Gaurav agrawal Cc: Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL); Vinod Kumar S 70786; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: RE: [SPRING] Query related to SR Architecture Gaurav, Not sure I understand the context for your requirement. But to the best of my understanding your requirement does not match MPLS architecture. Regards, Sasha Office: +972-39266302 Cell: +972-549266302 Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> From: spring [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gaurav agrawal Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 1:38 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL); Vinod Kumar S 70786 Subject: [spring] [SPRING] Query related to SR Architecture Hi, We would like to have a label stack with only two labels such a way that service label is a top label and the bottom label would be SR destination node label. This is to make sure each intermediate node perform the specified service based on the top label while reaching the destination. We would appreciate if anyone could clarify whether SR architecture could allow a service label to be a top label in a label stack. Thanks and Regards, Gaurav Agrawal [Company_logo] Mobile: +91-7838700296 Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
